home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19941031-19941221
/
000436_news@columbia.edu_Thu Dec 15 01:32:53 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu by watsun.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA28369
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>); Wed, 14 Dec 1994 20:32:58 -0500
Received: by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu id AA22110
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for kermit.misc@watsun); Wed, 14 Dec 1994 20:32:56 -0500
Path: news.columbia.edu!namaste.cc.columbia.edu!ycl6
From: ycl6@columbia.edu (Yeechang Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Any way to get Commo-like screen updating speeds with MS-Kermit?
Date: 15 Dec 1994 01:32:53 GMT
Organization: Trilateral Commission, Columbia University student chapter
Lines: 18
Message-Id: <3co6c5$lis@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>
References: <3cngvf$7qn@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <3co3vj$id9@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: Yeechang Lee <ycl6@columbia.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: namaste-cddi.cc.columbia.edu
Apparently-To: kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
In article <3co3vj$id9@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>,
Frank da Cruz <fdc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu> wrote:
|Kermit's emulator does a lot more (I'm willing to
|bet) than Commo's emulator.
No disagreements here, though Commo's VT102 emulation is better than
most.
|A VT320 is an astoundingly complex terminal
|compared to ANSI or VT100.
I've tried SET TERM VT102, but it doesn't seem any faster than in VT320
mode . . .
-- _____________________________________________________________________
Yeechang Lee (ycl6@columbia.edu)|Nevada Las Vegas Mission Jul'92-'94
Columbia University/New York City|Celestial Kingdom through Taco Bell
Still working on that juggling-while-I-play-the-harmonica trick . . .